Total Pageviews
Thursday, August 30, 2012
I Hope Old Lard Ass Is Right
From his mouth to Gods ear although I don't know how much attention God pays to him
End Result Of Liberal Breeding For Bucks Programs
This is the end result of decades of the liberals breeding for bucks programs where the more babies you make the fatter the check is. If you want to understand what is driving so many of the ills which affect and afflict our society today one need look no further than this. This is what liberalism is root and branch.
If each of these children cost our society just 18,000 a year to feed, clothe, house, educate and for medical expenses then we as a society could be spending about 15,000,000 a year for just these 3 families. That's right ladies and gentlemen up to 15,000,000 a year of your tax dollars may be going to support these families. Over 18 years these children may well cost our society 270,000,000. Now what happens if these 78 children have just 2 children of their own.
Some may be wondering how I came to the conclusion we the American tax payers are supporting these children. I have no direct evidence but as 72.5 % of ALL births in the AA community are to unwed mothers and we do support most or all of them its not an unreasonable conclusion. Granted the numbers I have given are educated guesses and assume that none of these women will ever support their families without government assistance but it is safe to say they will be receiving some level of support. In any case these men are not the exception, the sheer number of their children may be extreme but how many hundreds of thousands or million of others do we support with 4, 5, 6, or 7 children at what cost ?
The children of unwed mothers are more likely to fail school .... have substance abuse issues .... wind up in prison .... dead.... in fact every pathology our society exhibits you will find these children over represented and they vote democrat.
By Lydia Warren
PUBLISHED: 16:52 EST, 14 June 2012 | UPDATED: 16:54 EST, 14 June 2012
Three men in Tennessee have notched up a staggering 78 children by 46 different women between them - and are doing their best to squirm out of paying for a single one.
Terry Turnage has 23 children with 17 different women, while Richard M. Colbert has 25 children with 18 women. But Desmond Hatchett takes the record with 30 children with 11 women.
On rare occasions, they pay a few dollars to the long-suffering mothers but mostly leave the state to pick up the slack - while one eludes his responsibilities altogether thanks to a stint in prison.
The latest deadbeat dad to emerge from the state is Turnage, who was summoned before a judge over child support payments for his 23 kids by 17 different women - but didn't show up to court.
Scroll down for videos
One of the mothers, who had
spent nearly eight years with Turnage, said her knees buckled when a
prosecutor told her that the father of her child had 20 other children.
'During the whole relationship, I only knew of four children,' Latoya Shields told WREG. 'At that time, three years ago, my child was the 21st child. Yeah, that would be overwhelming for anybody.'
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2159476/Tennessees-deadbeat-dads-The-men-81-children-46-different-women--theyre-paying-child-support-them.html
If each of these children cost our society just 18,000 a year to feed, clothe, house, educate and for medical expenses then we as a society could be spending about 15,000,000 a year for just these 3 families. That's right ladies and gentlemen up to 15,000,000 a year of your tax dollars may be going to support these families. Over 18 years these children may well cost our society 270,000,000. Now what happens if these 78 children have just 2 children of their own.
Some may be wondering how I came to the conclusion we the American tax payers are supporting these children. I have no direct evidence but as 72.5 % of ALL births in the AA community are to unwed mothers and we do support most or all of them its not an unreasonable conclusion. Granted the numbers I have given are educated guesses and assume that none of these women will ever support their families without government assistance but it is safe to say they will be receiving some level of support. In any case these men are not the exception, the sheer number of their children may be extreme but how many hundreds of thousands or million of others do we support with 4, 5, 6, or 7 children at what cost ?
The children of unwed mothers are more likely to fail school .... have substance abuse issues .... wind up in prison .... dead.... in fact every pathology our society exhibits you will find these children over represented and they vote democrat.
Tennessee's deadbeat dads: The three men who have fathered 78 children with 46 different women... and they're not paying child support to any of them
By Lydia Warren
PUBLISHED: 16:52 EST, 14 June 2012 | UPDATED: 16:54 EST, 14 June 2012
Three men in Tennessee have notched up a staggering 78 children by 46 different women between them - and are doing their best to squirm out of paying for a single one.
Terry Turnage has 23 children with 17 different women, while Richard M. Colbert has 25 children with 18 women. But Desmond Hatchett takes the record with 30 children with 11 women.
On rare occasions, they pay a few dollars to the long-suffering mothers but mostly leave the state to pick up the slack - while one eludes his responsibilities altogether thanks to a stint in prison.
The latest deadbeat dad to emerge from the state is Turnage, who was summoned before a judge over child support payments for his 23 kids by 17 different women - but didn't show up to court.
Scroll down for videos
Virile: Desmond Hatchett, left, has 30 children
by at least 11 women while Terry Turnage, right, has 23 children by 17
women. They are both trying to get their child support payments lowered
Camera shy: Richard A. Colbert, who would not
allow his picture to be taken, said he does not have to pay for his 25
children by 18 different women as they are all adults
'During the whole relationship, I only knew of four children,' Latoya Shields told WREG. 'At that time, three years ago, my child was the 21st child. Yeah, that would be overwhelming for anybody.'
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2159476/Tennessees-deadbeat-dads-The-men-81-children-46-different-women--theyre-paying-child-support-them.html
Tuesday, August 28, 2012
The S.E.A.L.'S Do Not Support Obama
I can not point out a starker difference than this. These are the men who killed OBL ...they are the rough men who have stood ready watching over us for decades. Asking for little they have fought, bled and died in places both known and unknown across the globe. They are men of honor, duty and country. These men have achieved membership in perhaps the most elite well trained deadliest group of men the world has ever seen. They are our brothers our husbands and our sons and they do not support obama.
When the democrats renominate obama I want you to watch carefully both who speaks for obama and what they stand for ....the difference will be shocking. You will see both men and women who represent special interests and it is and will be their interests which dominate the democrat convention. It will NOT be what is best for the country, it will be about what is best for them and their narrow special interest groups. It will be unions, the race baiters, gays and lesbians,the pro abortion crowd who see no other issue but that. None of these groups have the best interests of the United States as their primary concern. These groups are carrion birds looking to feed and that is all they are. It will be these men and women who speak at the democrat convention and all will be asking whats in it for them. As I said... there cannot be a starker difference.
When the democrats renominate obama I want you to watch carefully both who speaks for obama and what they stand for ....the difference will be shocking. You will see both men and women who represent special interests and it is and will be their interests which dominate the democrat convention. It will NOT be what is best for the country, it will be about what is best for them and their narrow special interest groups. It will be unions, the race baiters, gays and lesbians,the pro abortion crowd who see no other issue but that. None of these groups have the best interests of the United States as their primary concern. These groups are carrion birds looking to feed and that is all they are. It will be these men and women who speak at the democrat convention and all will be asking whats in it for them. As I said... there cannot be a starker difference.
H/T Legal Insurrection for the vid
Jobs ..... Reagan VS Obama ... The O Is Lying ....Again
The White is claiming that obama has created more jobs than Reagan .....LOL.... their nose is of course growing but they continue to bank on the ignorance of the average democrat. Seriously if obama was creating so many jobs .... where are they ? Why is unemployment at 8.3 % ....and growing ?
The White House Is Crazy to Invite a Comparison of Job Creation under Reagan and Obama
August 27, 2012 by Dan Mitchell
I’ve done a few comparisons of economic performance under Reagan and Obama, sometimes using the interactive data from the Minneapolis Federal Reserve Bank.
And I’ve done a few TV interviews on the same subject.
But something was very different in this interview on the Fox morning show. I was asked to respond to the Obama campaign’s assertion that Barack Obama’s policies created more private-sector jobs than Ronald Reagan’s policies.
I confess that I did the interview without first checking the numbers, and may not have been overly animated since I was in Denver and had to wake up before 4:00 a.m., but I felt confident enough to joke about an intern torturing data in the bowels of the White House.
But now that I’m back at my desk and I’ve had a chance to review the numbers from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, I can now say, with full confidence, that Stephanie Cutter must be smoking crack (she’s also smoking hot, but that’s a separate discussion).
And her intern should be fired.
Here are the numbers for private sector jobs (technically “Private wage and salary workers”), looking at the first 42 months in office for both Reagan and Obama. I’m including both seasonally adjusted and raw numbers, just to show that there’s no way to slice the data to justify Ms. Cutter’s assertion.
And here’s a look at the comparative performance of Reagan and Obama, based on the percent increase in private jobs in the first 31 months.
I also looked at what would happen if agricultural and/or self-employed workers were added to the mix, but nothing changes. Reagan beats Obama with both hands tied behind his back.
And what makes these numbers even more stunning is that Obama took office in the middle of a downturn, so a lot of the job losses already had occurred. Reagan, by contrast, got hit with a recession after taking office. So even though I think that downturn can and should be blamed on Jimmy Carter, all of the job losses show up in Reagan’s column. Yet he still kicks the you-know-what out of Obama.
The lesson to draw from these numbers is that Presidents should reduce the burden of government if they want better economic performance. Saint Ronald understood this basic insight, but Barack the Destroyer somehow thinks America will be more prosperous if we mimic Europe’s welfare states.
http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2012/08/27/the-white-house-is-crazy-to-invite-a-comparison-of-job-creation-under-reagan-and-obama/
And I’ve done a few TV interviews on the same subject.
But something was very different in this interview on the Fox morning show. I was asked to respond to the Obama campaign’s assertion that Barack Obama’s policies created more private-sector jobs than Ronald Reagan’s policies.
I confess that I did the interview without first checking the numbers, and may not have been overly animated since I was in Denver and had to wake up before 4:00 a.m., but I felt confident enough to joke about an intern torturing data in the bowels of the White House.
But now that I’m back at my desk and I’ve had a chance to review the numbers from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, I can now say, with full confidence, that Stephanie Cutter must be smoking crack (she’s also smoking hot, but that’s a separate discussion).
And her intern should be fired.
Here are the numbers for private sector jobs (technically “Private wage and salary workers”), looking at the first 42 months in office for both Reagan and Obama. I’m including both seasonally adjusted and raw numbers, just to show that there’s no way to slice the data to justify Ms. Cutter’s assertion.
And here’s a look at the comparative performance of Reagan and Obama, based on the percent increase in private jobs in the first 31 months.
I also looked at what would happen if agricultural and/or self-employed workers were added to the mix, but nothing changes. Reagan beats Obama with both hands tied behind his back.
And what makes these numbers even more stunning is that Obama took office in the middle of a downturn, so a lot of the job losses already had occurred. Reagan, by contrast, got hit with a recession after taking office. So even though I think that downturn can and should be blamed on Jimmy Carter, all of the job losses show up in Reagan’s column. Yet he still kicks the you-know-what out of Obama.
The lesson to draw from these numbers is that Presidents should reduce the burden of government if they want better economic performance. Saint Ronald understood this basic insight, but Barack the Destroyer somehow thinks America will be more prosperous if we mimic Europe’s welfare states.
http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2012/08/27/the-white-house-is-crazy-to-invite-a-comparison-of-job-creation-under-reagan-and-obama/
Mitt Romney Acceptance Speech Watch Party
Thursday, August 30, 2012
Where... Mulligans 41 South Main, Wilkes Barre
When .... 8:00 - 11:00 PM
Cash Bar ..... Free on street parking ....they stop working the meters after 6 .... ya'll come
Monday, August 27, 2012
I Don't Think Democrats Are Serious People
Code Pink arrived in Tampa today with their traveling road show ....here are a few of the serious actors in the democrat party. When I get the final list of the speakers at the democrat convention it will be interesting to see who and what they are all about ....trust me none of them will have much in common with the average American. What they will be is a whole host of special interest groups all asking not what they can do for America but what America should be doing for them.
H/T Legal Insurrection
http://legalinsurrection.com/2012/08/branco-cartoon-math-class-dropouts/
Sunday, August 26, 2012
With Obama As A Friend The Middle Class Doesn't Need Any Enemies
Well it seem that in spite of his soaring rhetoric and supposed concern for the middle class obama's tenure as President has seen a drastic fall in middle class income. His policies have done nothing to lift the middle class and have had quite the opposite affect speeding the decline of the middle class. And he can't blame Bush.
The Presidential race is boiling down to one dominant issue: which
party's policies will do more to help the financially stressed American
middle class. President Obama's campaign theme is that Mitt Romney and
the Republicans cater to the rich, while Mr. Obama cares about
struggling families.
He may care, but he sure hasn't done much for them. New income data
from the Census Bureau, tabulated by former Census income specialists
at the nonpartisan economic consulting firm Sentier Research, reveal
that the three-and-a-half years of the Obama Presidency have done
enormous harm to middle-class households.
In
January 2009, the month President Obama entered the Oval Office and
shortly before he signed his stimulus spending bill, median household
income was $54,983. By June 2012, it had tumbled to $50,964, adjusted
for inflation. (See the chart nearby.) That's $4,019 in lost real
income, a little less than a month's income every year.
Unfair, you say, because Mr. Obama inherited a recession? Well, even
if you start the analysis when the recession ended in June 2009, the
numbers are dismal. Three years after the economy hit its trough,
median household income is down $2,544, or nearly 5%.
Add the authors: "The overall decline since June 2009 was larger
than the 2.6 percent decline that occurred" during the recession from
December 2007 to June 2009. For household income, in other words, the
Obama recovery has been worse than the Bush recession.
It's true that the Bush years overall were also not great for
household incomes. According to Sentier's analysis, real median
household income is down about 8% from $55,470 in 2000 before the
dot-com bubble burst. Some of this decline is due to the continuation
of a trend of smaller family size, lower fertility rates and more
Americans living alone. But some was also due to the subpar economic
growth across the 2000s.
That slow growth trend has become worse since the latest recession,
and this is where Mr. Obama is implicated. The President portrays the
financial decline of American families on his watch as part of a
decades-long trend. He's wrong. Real income for middle-income
households rose by roughly 30% from 1983 to 2005, according to the
Congressional Budget Office. The political left likes to blame the
ebbing of union power. But nongovernment unionization fell dramatically
in the 1980s and '90s, and incomes rose.
So what does explain falling real incomes? Slow growth, yes, but
another culprit has been rising prices—especially for food, gasoline,
medical procedures and college tuition—that have eroded worker
purchasing power. The Federal Reserve claims this is no problem because
"core inflation" has been relatively contained. But core inflation
excludes food and energy prices, which are two of the biggest
components of consumer budgets.
A key driver of higher wages in the 1980s and 1990s was a surge of
capital investment in computers, plant and equipment, which made
Americans workers more productive. When Mr. Obama pledges to raise
taxes on investment income (capital gains, dividends and small-business
profits), he is making it costlier to innovate and modernize. That
plays out over time into slower gains in productivity and wages.
Consider the toll from America's corporate tax rate, which is the
highest in the industrial world. A 2011 study by economists at the
American Enterprise Institute found that because of the capital flight
from the U.S. as a result of this high rate, "every additional dollar
of tax revenue [from the corporate tax] leads to a $4 decrease in
aggregate real wages." American workers would be the biggest
beneficiaries of tax reform.
The new income data reveal other eye-opening trends. The group that
has suffered the most during the Obama Presidency has been black
Americans, whose real incomes have fallen by more than 11%.
Mr. Obama also likes to say that government workers like teachers
are hurting and the private economy is doing "just fine." But the data
indicate that over the past three years households with government
workers saw their incomes decline less than households with private
workers. The public-private pay gap is now wider than ever ($77,998
government versus $63,800).
Every age group has seen a decline in income—except the elderly.
Those between the ages of 65 and 75 saw an average 6.5% gain in income,
though most are not working and collect Medicare and Social Security.
The last time incomes fell this fast was during the late 1970s under
Jimmy Carter, and it's no coincidence that economic policies then and
now are so similar. If Mr. Obama succeeds in convincing voters that he
really is the tribune of the middle class, it will be the political
conjurer's trick of the century.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303822204577468750027784434.html#
- REVIEW & OUTLOOK
- Updated August 24, 2012, 6:53 p.m. ET
Negative $4,019
The Obama years have been brutal on middle-class incomes.
The
big pay freeze is also the bitter fruit of public schools that have
failed to teach the basic skills and knowledge needed to succeed in a
competitive global economy. Rising health-care costs have also forced
employers to take money that used to go into higher wages to pay higher
premiums.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303822204577468750027784434.html#
Saturday, August 25, 2012
George Soros Got Robbed
Does This Mean Obama Is A Racist
I have written and posted other stories about this not long ago but it still really irks me on so many levels, so much so that when I see another piece on it I respond. What they are essentially setting up here is a race based school disciplinary system that will even further degrade our schools. As if that wasn't bad enough the liberals are openly saying that the state of the world is not what the state of the world actually is and they expect us to buy into it. There is a reason that African Americans are disciplined at much higher levels than most others.They are far more likely to commit offenses that require attention by school authorities and yes it really is as simple as that. The liberals would have to believe its racism but even in schools which are majority African American and largely run by African Americans the % does not change much. It strikes me that once again liberals living in that odd little world that so many inhabit are insisting we acompany them. This is what happens when you create policies based on the world as you wish it were not as it actually is.The problem is its a world that often has little to do with reality.
August 25, 2012
President Barack Obama recently signed an executive order hiring race-sensitive bureaucrats to hold meetings and mandate racial discipline quotas. The order charges his new racial justice team, in part, with "promoting a positive school climate that does not rely on methods that result in disparate use of disciplinary tools." In plain English, that means that if different races have different incidences of disciplinary action, those of a favored race who act worse will be punished less, or those of a disfavored race who act better will be punished more, or both
http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/08/obama_demands_race-based_school_discipline.html
August 25, 2012
Obama Demands Race-Based School Discipline
By Joy PullmannPresident Barack Obama recently signed an executive order hiring race-sensitive bureaucrats to hold meetings and mandate racial discipline quotas. The order charges his new racial justice team, in part, with "promoting a positive school climate that does not rely on methods that result in disparate use of disciplinary tools." In plain English, that means that if different races have different incidences of disciplinary action, those of a favored race who act worse will be punished less, or those of a disfavored race who act better will be punished more, or both
http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/08/obama_demands_race-based_school_discipline.html
Surprise ...Surprise ....Surprise .... Obama AKA Pinocchio Lies About Illegal Alien Deportations
Well it looks like obama once again has been exposed as playing fast and loose with the truth concerning his much touted stance on illegal alien removal .....nothing is ever what it seems with obama.
Another Lie… Obama Said Deportations Were Up Under His Regime – They’re Not
Posted by Jim Hoft on Saturday, August 25, 2012, 8:20 AM
The Obama Administration constantly claimed in speech after speech that
their administration was deporting more illegal immigrants than the
Bush Administration.
Not true.
The Daily Caller reported:
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/
Not true.
The Daily Caller reported:
Internal documents obtained by the House Judiciary Committee show that the Obama administration has been “cooking the books” in order to reach their “record” number of deported illegal immigrants, chairman Rep. Lamar Smith said Friday.H/T Gateway Pundit
Based on the internal U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) documents, the number of removals are actually down, the opposite of what the administration has been claiming.
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/
Eric Holder Hires Best And Brightest Of Democrat Party
Explains a lot ....does it not
The PJ Tatler has obtained documents from the Justice Department detailing efforts to recruit attorneys and staff who are dwarfs or who have “psychiatric disabilities”
or “severe intellectual disabilities.” On May 31, 2012, Assistant
Attorney General Tom Perez issued a directive to affirmatively recruit
people with these “targeted disabilities.”
This DOJ policy does not merely involve prohibitions against discrimination, but rather the documents reveal deliberate recruitment efforts to hire as attorneys and staff for the Department of Justice people suffering from psychiatric disorders and intellectual disabilities. Moreover, applicants can “self-identify” their disability by means of the “Standard Form 256, Self Identification Disability.”
Those with “targeted disabilities” may be hired through a “non-competitive” appointment. That means they don’t have to endure the regular civil service competition among applicants, but can be plucked from the stack of resumes and hired immediately instead.
According to the documents, those with these “targeted disabilities” may be hired “before the position is advertised” and even “before the position’s closing date.” Moreover, lawyers with psychiatric disabilities and “severe intellectual” disabilities receive a waiver from the requirement that a new DOJ employee have practiced law for one year before being hired.
You can read the detailed Civil Rights Division “Hiring of Persons With Targeted Disabilities Policy” memo here.
You can also read PJ Media’s full report on the attorneys hired for the Justice Department Civil Rights Division from 2009-2010 here in the Every Single One series.
Speaking of preferences, here is another document, the entire “Operational Diversity Management Plan,” obtained by PJ Media. It should be fascinating to those interested in racial preferences in government policy.
H/T PJ Tatler
http://pjmedia.com/tatler/2012/08/21/justice-department-recruits-dwarfs/
Holder Justice Department Recruits Dwarfs, Schizophrenics, and the ‘Intellectually Disabled’
This DOJ policy does not merely involve prohibitions against discrimination, but rather the documents reveal deliberate recruitment efforts to hire as attorneys and staff for the Department of Justice people suffering from psychiatric disorders and intellectual disabilities. Moreover, applicants can “self-identify” their disability by means of the “Standard Form 256, Self Identification Disability.”
Those with “targeted disabilities” may be hired through a “non-competitive” appointment. That means they don’t have to endure the regular civil service competition among applicants, but can be plucked from the stack of resumes and hired immediately instead.
According to the documents, those with these “targeted disabilities” may be hired “before the position is advertised” and even “before the position’s closing date.” Moreover, lawyers with psychiatric disabilities and “severe intellectual” disabilities receive a waiver from the requirement that a new DOJ employee have practiced law for one year before being hired.
You can read the detailed Civil Rights Division “Hiring of Persons With Targeted Disabilities Policy” memo here.
You can also read PJ Media’s full report on the attorneys hired for the Justice Department Civil Rights Division from 2009-2010 here in the Every Single One series.
Speaking of preferences, here is another document, the entire “Operational Diversity Management Plan,” obtained by PJ Media. It should be fascinating to those interested in racial preferences in government policy.
H/T PJ Tatler
http://pjmedia.com/tatler/2012/08/21/justice-department-recruits-dwarfs/
Friday, August 24, 2012
Suspected Rapist, Serial Abuser Of Woman, Known Liar, Disbarred Attorney And Cigar Aficionado To Keynote Democrat Convention
Well Republican Todd Akin has been pretty much drummed out of the Republican party for what he said but he should take heart as there is a path for redemption if he chooses to tread the path and can stand the company. The solution, become a democrat and given his history as a democrat he would likely soon find himself as a renown champion of women rights. How do I arrive at this conclusion you ask .... ted kennedy and billy jeff clinton. Billy jeff clinton is in fact a serial abuser of women, an alleged rapist, a known liar and a disbarred attorney. Granted with Todd Akin's miserly history of abusing women I suspect he could never became the Lion of the Senate as ted ( the swimmer ) kennedy or President as billy jeff clinton did. Akin just doesn't have the heft that either of those 2 did and do but if he was willing to continue his efforts and perhaps kill or rape a few women there seems to be no limit as to how far he could advance within the friendly confines of the democrat party. Take heart Congressman Akin all is not lost .... just lower your standards and commit a few felonies and you could find yourself running for the presidency of the United States or perhaps the keynote speaker at the next democrat nominating convention.
Levin Calls On Obama To Yank Bill Clinton As Keynote Speaker At Dem Convention
H/T Mark Levin
Thursday, August 23, 2012
The Democrat Stance On Abortion ..... Kill Them All Let God Sort Them Out
Well, rumor has it the democrat convention to renominate obama will be a fete to abortion as more and more women are added to speakers roles in response to the dust up in Missouri. Caused by a severe case of foot in mouth disorder by Republican candidate Todd Akin who was until recently considered a lock for a Missouri Senate seat. That seat currently held by a democrat was not so long ago labeled a sure pick up for any Republican with a pulse but with a deftness that surpasses my limited understanding the Republican shot off several of his toes and then seemed to have compounded the error by refusing to drop out of the race as decency would require.
Would his dropping out have made a difference ....who knows but it does tend to highlight a difference between Republicans and democrats. When a Republican dons a pair of golf shoes and steps on his crank in the full light of day, in front of God and the world they tend to fall on their swords. For better or worse that did not happen in this case and come what may we will have to live with the outcome. Democrats in similar circumstances will circle their wagons hunker down and hope to hold out against the onslaught ( think ted ( the swimmer ) kennedy and billy jeff clinton ) With Republican screw ups it is often we who lead the onslaught on our own while democrats start yelling HEY LOOK A SQUIRREL !!!!
Well the debate has come around to abortion and Paul Ryan and his so called extreme stance on abortion. Ryan believes in life in all circumstances and in a recent interview pointed out he is the V.P. pick and his positions are meaningless but even supposing Ryan was the top of the ticket are they any more extreme than the democrat position which is kill them all and let God sort them out and with a special focus on minority babies. Obama voted against born alive bills while in the Illinois Senate while in committee or present on the Senate floor. In other words he didn't have the stones to take a stand likely fearing it would affect future political opportunities. So I ask who's position is more extreme, Ryan's who believes in life or obama's who would allow a child born alive after a botched abortion to die. As I said the democrat position is kill them all and let God sort them out.
As a bonus however we are beginning to get an idea of the democrat platform for this election cycle 1 - abortion 2 - Romney's tax returns 3 - Romney's dog 4 - Romney's money 5 - Todd Akin 6 - skinny dipping ... I guess for the average democrat who has a difficult time with shinny things these are the defining issues of our times but I am left with the nagging feeling they might be missing a thing or 2 that need attention
At issue is Obama�s opposition to Illinois legislation in 2001, 2002 and 2003 that would have defined any aborted fetus that showed signs of life as a "born alive infant" entitled to legal protection, even if doctors believe it could not survive.
Obama opposed the 2001 and 2002 "born alive" bills as backdoor attacks on a woman�s legal right to abortion, but he says he would have been "fully in support" of a similar federal bill that President Bush had signed in 2002, because it contained protections for Roe v. Wade.
We find that, as the NRLC said in a recent statement, Obama voted in committee against the 2003 state bill that was nearly identical to the federal act he says he would have supported. Both contained identical clauses saying that nothing in the bills could be construed to affect legal rights of an unborn fetus, according to an undisputed summary written immediately after the committee�s 2003 mark-up session.
http://www.factcheck.org/2008/08/obama-and-infanticide/
Would his dropping out have made a difference ....who knows but it does tend to highlight a difference between Republicans and democrats. When a Republican dons a pair of golf shoes and steps on his crank in the full light of day, in front of God and the world they tend to fall on their swords. For better or worse that did not happen in this case and come what may we will have to live with the outcome. Democrats in similar circumstances will circle their wagons hunker down and hope to hold out against the onslaught ( think ted ( the swimmer ) kennedy and billy jeff clinton ) With Republican screw ups it is often we who lead the onslaught on our own while democrats start yelling HEY LOOK A SQUIRREL !!!!
Well the debate has come around to abortion and Paul Ryan and his so called extreme stance on abortion. Ryan believes in life in all circumstances and in a recent interview pointed out he is the V.P. pick and his positions are meaningless but even supposing Ryan was the top of the ticket are they any more extreme than the democrat position which is kill them all and let God sort them out and with a special focus on minority babies. Obama voted against born alive bills while in the Illinois Senate while in committee or present on the Senate floor. In other words he didn't have the stones to take a stand likely fearing it would affect future political opportunities. So I ask who's position is more extreme, Ryan's who believes in life or obama's who would allow a child born alive after a botched abortion to die. As I said the democrat position is kill them all and let God sort them out.
As a bonus however we are beginning to get an idea of the democrat platform for this election cycle 1 - abortion 2 - Romney's tax returns 3 - Romney's dog 4 - Romney's money 5 - Todd Akin 6 - skinny dipping ... I guess for the average democrat who has a difficult time with shinny things these are the defining issues of our times but I am left with the nagging feeling they might be missing a thing or 2 that need attention
Summary
Anti-abortion activists accuse Obama of "supporting infanticide," and the National Right to Life Committee says he�s conducted a "four-year effort to cover up his full role in killing legislation to protect born-alive survivors of abortions." Obama says they�re "lying."At issue is Obama�s opposition to Illinois legislation in 2001, 2002 and 2003 that would have defined any aborted fetus that showed signs of life as a "born alive infant" entitled to legal protection, even if doctors believe it could not survive.
Obama opposed the 2001 and 2002 "born alive" bills as backdoor attacks on a woman�s legal right to abortion, but he says he would have been "fully in support" of a similar federal bill that President Bush had signed in 2002, because it contained protections for Roe v. Wade.
We find that, as the NRLC said in a recent statement, Obama voted in committee against the 2003 state bill that was nearly identical to the federal act he says he would have supported. Both contained identical clauses saying that nothing in the bills could be construed to affect legal rights of an unborn fetus, according to an undisputed summary written immediately after the committee�s 2003 mark-up session.
http://www.factcheck.org/2008/08/obama-and-infanticide/
Education Spending ....The Truth
The democrats insist we continue to increase education funding with every new budget year and tell us its for the children. As this chart clearly shows its not for the children it is for school staff ( unions )
http://www.commonwealthfoundation.org/research/detail/pennsylvania-education-spending-2
Pennsylvania Public School Spending Continues to Grow
Public School Staffing has Increased while Enrollment has Declined
http://www.commonwealthfoundation.org/research/detail/pennsylvania-education-spending-2
Pennsylvania Public School Spending Continues to Grow
- K-12 public education spending has dramatically increased in Pennsylvania.
- Pennsylvania's education spending increased from $4 billion in 1980 to more than $25 billion in 2009—a 133% increase in per-student spending, after adjusting for inflation.
- Pennsylvania school districts spent more than $13,000 per student in 2008-09.
- School construction and debt spending has doubled in a decade.
- Prevailing wage laws increase the cost of construction by 20% or more; repealing this mandate would save $400 million annually in taxpayer-funded construction costs.
- Most of these new employees pay dues to the PSEA labor union, which runs one of the largest political action committees in Pennsylvania.
- The PSEA, Pennsylvania School Board Association, and other groups receive tens of millions of dollars from school districts while lobbying for more education spending and against substantive education reforms, including school choice and taxpayer control of tax increases.
Pennsylvania Public School Enrollment and Staff | |||
2000 | 2009 | Change | |
Enrollment | 1,814,311 | 1,787,351 | -26,960 |
Total Staff | 231,770 | 264,697 | 32,927 |
(includes public charter schools) | |||
Source: PA Department of Education |
Wednesday, August 22, 2012
Billy Jeff Clinton On Todd Akin
With ted ( the swimmer ) kennedy and billy jeff clinton in their stable they want to lecture us on civility toward women ....rich.
H/T Legal Insurrection
http://legalinsurrection.com/
Tuesday, August 21, 2012
Public Service Unions Are Ticks On Societies Ass
Every once in a while even I am amazed at the sheer ignorance of unions and the depth that these unions will go to pick the last piece of carrion off the corpse that Detroit has long been. The buzzards have long since stopped hovering over Detroit and have settled in for the feast but even now with strips of its flesh dangling from the beaks of these carrion eaters the unions are busily going through the cities pockets and prying the coppers off its eyes.
Yet even with a department so bloated that it has a horseshoer and no horses, the local union president said it is "not possible" to eliminate positions.
Union rules have turned the department into a government jobs program, some critics say.
The horseshoer’s job description is "to shoe horses and to do general blacksmith work … and to perform related work as required." The description was last updated in 1967.
The Detroit Water and Sewerage Department (DWSD) has a large debt, rising water prices and inefficient services — using almost twice the number of employees per gallon as other cities like Chicago.
A recent independent report about the DWSD recommends that the city trim more than 80 percent of the department’s workforce. The consultant who wrote the report found 257 job descriptions, including a horseshoer. Capitol Confidential sent a Freedom of Information Act request to the department for the salary, benefits and job description of the horseshoer position.
http://www.michigancapitolconfidential.com/17404
No Horses, But Detroit Water Department Employs 'Horseshoer'
Union head says it's 'not possible' to eliminate positions from bloated city entity
By Jarrett Skorup | Aug. 20, 2012
Despite having no horses, the water and sewerage department for the city of Detroit employs a horseshoer.Yet even with a department so bloated that it has a horseshoer and no horses, the local union president said it is "not possible" to eliminate positions.
Union rules have turned the department into a government jobs program, some critics say.
The horseshoer’s job description is "to shoe horses and to do general blacksmith work … and to perform related work as required." The description was last updated in 1967.
The Detroit Water and Sewerage Department (DWSD) has a large debt, rising water prices and inefficient services — using almost twice the number of employees per gallon as other cities like Chicago.
A recent independent report about the DWSD recommends that the city trim more than 80 percent of the department’s workforce. The consultant who wrote the report found 257 job descriptions, including a horseshoer. Capitol Confidential sent a Freedom of Information Act request to the department for the salary, benefits and job description of the horseshoer position.
http://www.michigancapitolconfidential.com/17404
Headlines
Oh my: Romney’s cash advantage over Obama grows to more than $60 million
Poetic justice: Solyndra’s glass tubes now part of a modern art exhibit
Study: Red states more disposed to charitable giving than blue states
Democratic pollster PPP warns that Romney has taken a slight lead in Wisconsin
Knock-Out Game Comes to Cincinnati – Black Gang Beats White Man Unconscious… They “Were Bored”
Tampa group says voter rolls rife with felons
Shock poll: Obama could lose Illinois, Romney leads in Chicago suburbs
WALL STREET PROSECUTIONS UNDER OBAMA: ZILCH
Monday, August 20, 2012
What This Election Is Really About ..... No Not Romney's Tax Returns
I hope all you liberals who read this are sitting down. This election is not about tax returns, dogs or where Romney keeps his money. I know, shocking because if one listens to the democrats that is just what this election is all about. I personally have always been somewhat sceptical that the fate of our nation was dependant on Romney's tax returns but I'm not a liberal and never really believed obama had a pet unicorn or could raise the dead ....hmmmmmm well O.K. maybe he can do that last one .... he is from Chicago but that is not what this election is about. This election is going to decide if we , as a nation wind up sleeping on a steam grate pushing a shopping cart around a bad part of town and not Romney's underware.
Sunday, August 19, 2012
So What Were Obama Supporters Up To Yesterday
Nothing new or unusal just making pests of themselves.
Gross… Code Pink Activists Dress Up as Vaginas for Free Abortions Rally
Posted by Jim Hoft on Sunday, August 19, 2012, 7:22 AM
Gross.
Code Pink activists dressed as vaginas for the rally for free birth control and abortions yesterday in Washington DC. (Twitchy)
Because having abortion paid for by the state is a natural human right.
(Twitchy)
Hat Tip Mara
H/T Gateway Pundit
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/
Code Pink activists dressed as vaginas for the rally for free birth control and abortions yesterday in Washington DC. (Twitchy)
Because having abortion paid for by the state is a natural human right.
(Twitchy)
Hat Tip Mara
H/T Gateway Pundit
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/
Saturday, August 18, 2012
Is There Really A Media Bias ?
Of course posing that as a question was silly. The only folks who refuse to accept that there is a media bias are those who benefit from it .... namely liberals. In fairness some liberals will admit there is a liberal bias but generally believe that it has little or no affect on politics and policy. My opinion is its a duck, you can wrap it in a moose suit and call it a moose but its still a duck in a moose suit.
Has The Dept Of Homeland Security Become A Lesbian Only Disco
Well once again it seems the law of unintended consequences is rearing its ugly head and taking another wee chunk out of obama's already skinny ass. There have long been rumors that head of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano is a lesbian. These rumors did not start with her ascendancy to one of the top cop posts in the nation but have been circulating for years. That pick may come back to haunt obama.
Personally I have never held these rumors, true or false against her and generally have figured at least we like the same things. I will profess to even having been somewhat sympathetic as I have a list of the 100 stupidest things I have done because of women and I will admit that some of those entries are quite spectacular in the depth and breath of stupid on display. That being said I don't know if being gay or a lesbian is voluntary or its the way your born but I will say that I have known more than a few folks who seem to slip quite easily and comfortably into or out of gay .... straight lifestyles. The point being I didn't have a choice it was the way I was issued so to speak but I do have that list of the 100 stupidest things I have ever done because of women and I always thought that if it was a choice and some made a actual conscious decision to cultivate a desire for women they must be on the negative side of sanity, courageous perhaps but stupid .... like I said I do have that list and more than a few things on that list have left me with a limp.
In any case there are charges and lawsuits being levied and filed as we speak suggesting that the upper ranks of management of the Dept of Homeland Security has become very hostile to men. It is said that some of those women who Napolitano brought with her soon after taking the post and are said to be very close to her have created an atmosphere that is blatantly hostile to men and have restricted careers and has gone so far as intimidation. Time will tell but these charges don't surprise me as some may have noted that obama has filled a great many positions with some of the most militant leftists of all sorts that our nation can produce and while those folks look interesting sitting in trees for a couple of years or in newsreels throwing paint on people you really don't want them in charge......unless of course your one of them and obama is.
Personally I have never held these rumors, true or false against her and generally have figured at least we like the same things. I will profess to even having been somewhat sympathetic as I have a list of the 100 stupidest things I have done because of women and I will admit that some of those entries are quite spectacular in the depth and breath of stupid on display. That being said I don't know if being gay or a lesbian is voluntary or its the way your born but I will say that I have known more than a few folks who seem to slip quite easily and comfortably into or out of gay .... straight lifestyles. The point being I didn't have a choice it was the way I was issued so to speak but I do have that list of the 100 stupidest things I have ever done because of women and I always thought that if it was a choice and some made a actual conscious decision to cultivate a desire for women they must be on the negative side of sanity, courageous perhaps but stupid .... like I said I do have that list and more than a few things on that list have left me with a limp.
In any case there are charges and lawsuits being levied and filed as we speak suggesting that the upper ranks of management of the Dept of Homeland Security has become very hostile to men. It is said that some of those women who Napolitano brought with her soon after taking the post and are said to be very close to her have created an atmosphere that is blatantly hostile to men and have restricted careers and has gone so far as intimidation. Time will tell but these charges don't surprise me as some may have noted that obama has filled a great many positions with some of the most militant leftists of all sorts that our nation can produce and while those folks look interesting sitting in trees for a couple of years or in newsreels throwing paint on people you really don't want them in charge......unless of course your one of them and obama is.
Napolitano-run dept. treated male staffers like lapdogs: suit
JOSEPH STRAW, REUVEN BLAU, RICH SCHAPIRO
Thursday, August 09, 2012
Looks like the Department of Homeland Security could be renamed the Department of Hyper Sexuality.
A blistering federal discrimination suit accuses agency honcho Janet Napolitano of turning the department into a female-run “frat house” where male staffers were banished to the bathrooms and routinely humiliated.
James Hayes Jr., who now is New York’s top Homeland Security cop, claims Napolitano filled top spots in Washington, D.C., with two of her gal pals who were bent on tormenting male employees.
The suit identified them as Dora Schriro, who is now running the city Department of Correction, and Suzanne Barr, the chief of staff for the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
Soon after Schriro and Barr were hired in January 2009, male staffers were treated like lapdogs, Hayes claims.
Barr “moved the entire contents of the offices of three employees, including name plates, computers and telephones, to the men’s bathroom at ICE headquarters,” the suit says.
Barr also stole a male staffer’s BlackBerry and fired off a message to his female supervisor indicating that he “had a crush on [her] and fantasized about her,” Hayes claims.
http://articles.nydailynews.com/2012-08-09/news/33122400_1_suit-secretary-napolitano-claims
A blistering federal discrimination suit accuses agency honcho Janet Napolitano of turning the department into a female-run “frat house” where male staffers were banished to the bathrooms and routinely humiliated.
James Hayes Jr., who now is New York’s top Homeland Security cop, claims Napolitano filled top spots in Washington, D.C., with two of her gal pals who were bent on tormenting male employees.
The suit identified them as Dora Schriro, who is now running the city Department of Correction, and Suzanne Barr, the chief of staff for the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
Soon after Schriro and Barr were hired in January 2009, male staffers were treated like lapdogs, Hayes claims.
Barr “moved the entire contents of the offices of three employees, including name plates, computers and telephones, to the men’s bathroom at ICE headquarters,” the suit says.
Barr also stole a male staffer’s BlackBerry and fired off a message to his female supervisor indicating that he “had a crush on [her] and fantasized about her,” Hayes claims.
http://articles.nydailynews.com/2012-08-09/news/33122400_1_suit-secretary-napolitano-claims
Friday, August 17, 2012
Thursday, August 16, 2012
Headlines
Chicago Erects Memorial Marker to Commemorate Site of Obamas First Kiss at Baskin-Robbins… A Company Saved By Bain
Posted by Jim Hoft on Thursday, August 16, 2012, 8:46 AM
Dem Representative Investigated For Having Sex at Rest Stop With 17 Year-Old Boy
Posted by Jim Hoft on Thursday, August 16, 2012, 8:32 AM
Okie Businessman Erects Sign: “Obama Can Kiss Our A$$!”
Posted by Jim Hoft on Thursday, August 16, 2012, 11:29 AM
Rasmussen: Romney edging Obama in Wisconsin 48/47
Great news: Prominent Dem and Obama bundler probably won’t be prosecuted for $1B+ disappearance of customer funds
Gallup: Obama disapproval in the 60s on the economy, budget deficit
Swing state poll: After picking Ryan, Romney now leads in Ohio, Virginia — and Florida
Allegations of lewd conduct at highest levels of ICE force leave of absence by chief of staff
GOP convention to feature former Obama co-chair Artur Davis
Biden Is Toast
Barack Obama Dismisses Sarah Palin’s Hillary Suggestion – Will Keep Joe Biden on Ticket
Posted by Jim Hoft on Thursday, August 16, 2012, 5:43 AM
H/T Gateway Pundit
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2012/08/barack-obama-dismisses-sarah-palins-hillary-suggestion-will-keep-joe-biden-on-ticket/#comment-759757
Wednesday, August 15, 2012
They Say A Picture Is Worth A 1,000 words
Here is 6,000 words I didn't have to write
because it’s the truth.
Branco’s Facebook page is Freedom’s Battle .
H/T Legal Insurrection
http://legalinsurrection.com/tag/a-f-branco/
because it’s the truth.
Branco’s Facebook page is Freedom’s Battle .
H/T Legal Insurrection
http://legalinsurrection.com/tag/a-f-branco/
Gay Obama Supporter Shoots Guard At Pro Life Family Research Council
Do I know he was a obama supporter ...well someone told me he was ....prove he wasn't.
FRC shooting suspect was volunteering at DC LGBT Community Center
Shooting at Family Research Council headquarters
Will media rush to judgment?
127
34
At approximately 11:35 a.m. eastern Casey
Mattox of the Family Research Council tweeted that there had been a
shooting at their headquarters in downtown DC. While few details
are known, Mattox reports that a guard was shot.
H/T Legal Insurrection
http://legalinsurrection.com/
H/T Legal Insurrection
http://legalinsurrection.com/
Anyone Want To See What Bill Clinton's Chief Of Staff Thinks Of Paul Ryan
If anyone was wondering what democrats really think of Paul Ryan maybe this will answer that question.
Tuesday, August 14, 2012
Obama In November 2009: Right, One-Third Of ObamaCare Funding Comes From Cuts To Medicare
A Question
Its a pretty simple question ....How much of my labor is my neighbor entitled to ? Comments are open folks. If you look at the federal budget for 2010 you might notice that we spent nearly every dime of real money we took in on entitlements. We used the credit cards for everything else
Monday, August 13, 2012
Prayers
A shooting in College Station has left 3 dead and several injured. One, a local Constable and a civilian and as I write this word is the suspect has also died of his injuries. Another injured was a College Station police officer. I know the area and its people well having lived in both Bryan and College Station for close to 20 years and my prayers go out to all.
One of two officers shot during an incident on Fidelity Street in College Station has died, according to several sources. (The Eagle)
H/T Gateway Pundit
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2012/08/multiple-people-shot-near-texas-am-campus-gunman-apprehended/
UPDATE ....for those of you who may want to the below is a link to the local paper
http://www.theeagle.com/
Multiple People Shot Near Texas A&M Campus – Gunman Apprehended …Update: 2 Officers Shot, 1 Killed
Posted by Jim Hoft on Monday, August 13, 2012, 12:08 PM
One of two officers shot during an incident on Fidelity Street in College Station has died, according to several sources. (The Eagle)
H/T Gateway Pundit
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2012/08/multiple-people-shot-near-texas-am-campus-gunman-apprehended/
UPDATE ....for those of you who may want to the below is a link to the local paper
http://www.theeagle.com/
Obama And The Democrats Fiddle ..... Rome Burns
If you are watching the democrats attack Paul Ryan on his budget plan it might seem that the nation's financial security and our 2 largest social programs are in the pink and everything is going swimmingly, according the democrats. Well according to the Social Security Trusties and the Medicare Trusties, SS is broke in 2034 and Medicare is broke in 2024. Paul Ryan has a plan ....the democrats have __________. No that was not a mistake, that empty space is the democrats plan to fix both Social Security and Medicare. It seems to me that the democrats are quite content to ignore the problem and slander anyone who attempts to address the issue beyond the usual clucking they do when the subject is brought up and it is pointed out that both are near bankruptcy. They are more than willing to sell our souls and our well being to win another election or 2 and that folks is all the time they have until the toilet is flushed. One has to ask if the democrats really care if Medicare goes broke and if that is indeed their plan. Will that mean that they will finally get their universal health care by allowing every other option to be destroyed. I would not put it past them.
Obamacare lowers projected Medicare costs by 25% over the 75-year term. Most of the savings are related to reducing annual payment increases to providers, of which the Trustees note, “the long-term viability of this provision is debatable.”
http://247wallst.com/2012/04/23/social-security-medicare-still-going-broke/
After 2022, [OASI+DI] trust fund assets will be redeemed in amounts that exceed interest earnings until trust fund reserves are exhausted in 2036, one year earlier than was projected last year. Thereafter, tax income would be sufficient to pay only about three-quarters of scheduled benefits through 2085.Medicare posts equally sobering numbers. The Health Insurance (HI) portion of Medicare is being hit by the slow US economic recovery and by higher costs for medical care. The Trustees project that the HI trust fund will be exhausted in 2024:
Over 75 years, HI’s actuarial imbalance is estimated to be equivalent to 21 percent of tax receipts or 17 percent of program outlays.Medicare parts B and D (supplemental insurance and prescription drugs) are projected to be adequately financed indefinitely, but that’s due to a guaranteed Congressional allocation that currently amounts to 1.9% of GDP in 2010 and will reach 4.1% of GDP by 2085.
Obamacare lowers projected Medicare costs by 25% over the 75-year term. Most of the savings are related to reducing annual payment increases to providers, of which the Trustees note, “the long-term viability of this provision is debatable.”
http://247wallst.com/2012/04/23/social-security-medicare-still-going-broke/
Sunday, August 12, 2012
Big Crowds For Ryan
10,000 Greet Paul Ryan Back to Wisconsin
Posted by Jim Hoft on Sunday, August 12, 2012, 7:03 PM
10,000 supporters greeted Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI) back to Waukesha, Wisconsin.
H/T Gateway Pundit
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/
UpDate ...More Pics from Legal Insurrection
http://legalinsurrection.com/
The line of car seemed to go on forever:
The crowd was large:
And Anne managed to get pretty close to the stage
H/T Gateway Pundit
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/
UpDate ...More Pics from Legal Insurrection
http://legalinsurrection.com/
The line of car seemed to go on forever:
The crowd was large:
And Anne managed to get pretty close to the stage
+28
0
The Only Person Running For President Who has Cut Both Social Security And Medicare .....Is OBAMA
Obama has cut both Social Security and Medicare ..... Medicare when he raided it to pay for obamacare and Social Security when he cut the payroll tax which is the sole funding mechanism for Social Security.
She's touted by the liberal media as one of the brightest commentators on television, yet MSNBC's Rachel Maddow got thoroughly demolished by National Review editor Rich Lowry on Sunday's Meet the Press.
When continually asked by Lowry to defend the President's $700 billion Medicare cuts in ObamaCare, Maddow repeatedly refused making herself look tremendously foolish (video follows with transcript and commentary):
Read more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2012/08/12/national-reviews-rich-lowry-destroys-msnbcs-rachel-maddow-meet-press#ixzz23M6Z5II1
She's touted by the liberal media as one of the brightest commentators on television, yet MSNBC's Rachel Maddow got thoroughly demolished by National Review editor Rich Lowry on Sunday's Meet the Press.
When continually asked by Lowry to defend the President's $700 billion Medicare cuts in ObamaCare, Maddow repeatedly refused making herself look tremendously foolish (video follows with transcript and commentary):
RICH LOWRY, NATIONAL REVIEW: Republicans should go on offense on Medicare, because the president as part of ObamaCare passed $700 billion in cuts in Medicare. And Romney wants to repeal ObamaCare, including those cuts. So at the top of those…
Read more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2012/08/12/national-reviews-rich-lowry-destroys-msnbcs-rachel-maddow-meet-press#ixzz23M6Z5II1
Looking At These Pictures Someone Must Like Ryan
This is what 2012 looks like — lines around the block at Romney-Ryan rally in High Point, NC
One picture is the front of the line, one picture kinda the back,
EXCEPT my camera can’t capture two and a half blocks of people.
Many are actually women (the shock).
Update — Overflow crowds in Mooresville, as reported by reader Hope:
My 18 year old daughter and I attempted to go to the Romney/Ryan rally this morning in Mooresville , NC. This is a video [image below] of the crowd outside around 9 a.m. The crowd behind me was as big. We did not get in as the crowd was too large. The fire marshal turned the crowds away. This was as close as we got. We saw about 12 protestors in 3 separate groups of 4 each. They were not convincing anyone that “Offshore Mitt” posed any threat to the country. As one man said to me…we are the people that work for a living and the people that are protesting are the people that vote for a living. Be encouraged. There are many, many good people with us.
I have always enjoyed your blog.
(added) Hope sends along another photo, taken by her daughter, giving another perspective on the crowd:
H/T Legal Insurrectionhttp://legalinsurrection.com/
Lets Watch And See How Easily A Democrat Lies
Please keep in mind this woman was hand selected by obama to head the democrat party. I am constantly amazed that so many people take democrats seriously and that they can convince so many that what is so obviously a failure may indeed be a success and yet they do. I am becoming increasingly convinced that the ignorant among us should be allowed to exercise no rights or privileges which can affect other peoples lives ....voting being one of those.
Saturday, August 11, 2012
Laureen Cummings On Romney Choice Of Ryan
** For Immediate Release –
Laureen Cummings on Mitt Romney's VP choice **
“The ‘R & R’ team promises
America some badly needed “r&r” from the irresponsible, job killing policies
of the Obama Administration. Paul Ryan
is the right choice at the right time and I commend Mitt Romney on his
selection.”
Its Ryan
The Warrior Wonk
Rasmussen: Ryan favorability 39/25, 52/29 among … seniors
FROM NATURE AND GOD .... NOT GOVERNMENTS
I'll be adding to this over the course of the day. Obama and his Flying Monkey's have been touting Romney's supposed lack of a financial plan well the pick of Ryan solves that as well as several issues both sides have admitted are problems and need to be addressed but the democrats have refused to even discuss. The big one is Social Security which everyone admits is in trouble but the democrats only plan seems to be to insert head in sand and ignore the issue..... I think the contrast between obama/biden and R/R is going to be stark ...gloom, doom, misery and low ball or sunshine and light with real ideas rather than wishful thinking. Lets the games begin.
Romney Rakes in Big Haul After Ryan Announcement
The Romney campaign has outraised the Obama campaign by tens of millions of dollars over the past three months. The Ryan pick seems to have kicked the campaign’s fundraising into overdrive.
http://pjmedia.com/tatler/2012/08/11/romney-rakes-in-big-haul-after-ryan-announcement/
Friday, August 10, 2012
Paul Ryan ?
Rumor has it Romney to name V.P. pick Saturday morning .... A private jet is rumored to be in Paul Ryan's hometown.
Headlines
Pittsburgh Rebound Sparked by Spurned Gas Frackers
High-Ranking Mexican Drug Cartel Member Makes Explosive Allegation: ‘Fast and Furious’ Is Not What You Think It Is
Figures… Obama’s Favorite Author Is Suspended for Plagiarizing
Big Sis Slapped With Discrimination Suit for Reportedly Favoring Gal Pals
10,000 Dead Virginia Voters
EDITORIAL: The Civil War of 2016
U.S. military officers are told to plan to fight Americans
FactCheck.org calls 'low blow' new Obama 'Son of Boss' attack ad
Obama's slumdog brother: Meet the hopeless drunk from a Nairobi shanty town
Justice Dept. seeks Florida noncitizen voter-purge information
U.S. Defense Firms Preparing to Send Layoff Notices
Sheriff Joe Raids GNC Nutrition: 21 Illegals Using Stolen IDs (Including Those of Dead Americans)
Latest Foreclosure Data May Be A Bad Sign For The US Housing Recovery
Janet Napolitano’s DHS Commences Witch Hunt Against Whistleblowers on Amnesty
Brother Of Luzerne County Republican Chairman And Republican Committeeman Slams Voter I.D. Law
Pennsylvania Voter ID law is a blatant attempt to suppress the vote
- PENNSYLVANIA VOTER ID LAW
- AUGUST 9, 2012
- BY: STEVE URBANSK I
The Pennsylvania Voter ID law will hopefully be put to a merciful end next week by Commonwealth Court Judge Robert Simpson. The Pennsylvania law is one of many new laws across the country passed exclusively by Republican controlled legislatures with one purpose in mind, and that is to suppress the vote of classes of voters who tend to vote Democratic.
Judge Simpson heard seven days of testimony concerning the law, which included some startling admissions from the Commonwealth. Among the eye opening admissions from the Commonwealth are that "(T)here have been no investigations or prosecutions of in-person voter fraud in Pennsylvania; and the parties do not have direct personal knowledge of any such investigations or prosecutions in other states."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)